July 2025

What Should the CBC Be?

Full Report

Overview

This report presents the findings of a two-year study that draws on best practices in public service media from within Canada and in 17 other countries around the world. It is informed by consultation with a broad range of media and public media experts, as well as insights from our national survey, “Do We Need the CBC?” We sought to understand the current role of public media in the larger Canadian media landscape, to assess its relevance, and to propose appropriate recommendations to bring the CBC/Radio-Canada — and the resources allocated to it — in line with needs and expectations of Canadians today.

Key Findings

  • Put simply, 78% of Canadians want the CBC/Radio-Canada to continue, especially if it addresses the major criticisms levelled against it. This is true across political lines, ages and regions.

  • Through funding cuts, technological developments and environmental conditions (such as the decline of local journalism), the CBC/Radio-Canada is no longer universally accessible to all Canadians. The CBC/Radio-Canada will better serve the country when it is appropriately funded and mandated through the lens of what the audience needs first — including the news-avoidant audience.

  • Canada has funded its public media service at a much lower level (around $33 per capita today) than most of its international counterparts (currently an average of $79 per capita) for decades. While the federal government committed to maintaining funding in 2025, funding allotments should not seem arbitrary. The CBC/Radio-Canada’s budget needs to be indexed to the scope of its mandate and its ability to perform its role as Canada’s national public media service. If the government expects to raise the per capita funding for the CBC/Radio-Canada, Canadians need to be assured of the value of the product they will be paying for. Regular and in-depth demographic reviews of the audience should be established to determine the kind of content Canadians require and the way they need to receive it. Models for this form of consultation include nation-wide town hall meetings, citizens’ assemblies, and comprehensive surveys of the public (not merely existing members of the CBC/Radio-Canada’s audience).

  • Canada’s approach to reviewing the mandate for the CBC/Radio-Canada, its national public media service, is undefined and inconsistent with best practices in place in many leading countries. (The last full mandate review of the CBC/Radio-Canada before 2025 was conducted in 1991.) The following legislative changes will help to keep the CBC/Radio-Canada up to date in better serving all Canadians:

    • Schedule regular mandate reviews of the CBC/Radio-Canada at a predetermined schedule (i.e., every five or 10 years). These reviews should be held outside election cycles.

    • Mandate review committees should be cross-partisan or nonpartisan and involve public consultations or in-depth demographic surveys: they need to be based on actual current data, not on vibes.

  • Originally designed to protect cultural tradition and/or educate the public, the role of public media services worldwide especially in regions affected by the climate crisis and/or geopolitical changes is shifting to include national emergency preparedness and crisis response, especially in a world of increasing misinformation/disinformation and news deserts. This aspect of the CBC’s mandate should be strengthened and formalized, with appropriate resources (for instance: well-maintained radio towers and local journalism coverage) allocated to preserving the CBC’s role as an emergency communications support and a cultural connector across the country — important considerations in ensuring Canada’s sovereignty. 

  • The CBC/Radio-Canada serves its function when Canadians use it, and is best situated to fulfill its mandate when it is able to reach everyone in the country. Young audiences have moved online, Canadians in small towns don’t get coverage (or reception) and demographic minorities don’t feel adequately represented. We highlight four areas of focus for the CBC/Radio-Canada to continue investing in to maximize its reach and impact to all Canadians: 

    • Address the digital divide through funding, mandate and cultural prioritization.

    • Invest in local journalism. Across the country, more than half of Canada are dissatisfied by their local news options (this number rises outside cities and towns).

    • Create meaningful, not performative, representation. This goal addresses equity, diversity and inclusion, but  more broadly, political and regional diversity as well.

    • Invest in media literacy programs: Enacted at the federal/public service level in the most trusted jurisdictions worldwide, this measure serves all media, not only public media.

  • The CBC and Radio-Canada remain the most trusted media outlets in their respective languages, yet trust in each is declining, as it is in media and in public media elsewhere. Trust is earned when the audience knows they can hold the Corporation to account and that their criticisms are heard. Three ways to build trust and transparency at the CBC/Radio-Canada are to:

    • Create more public engagement outside of the regulated CRTC license renewal channels. Canadians should feel seen and heard by their public media service.

    • Consider regional councils (for instance, provincial advisory boards) made up of representative citizen groups who can advise on community priorities, changing trends and offer feedback on the way the CBC/Radio-Canada serves the community. Canadians should have visibility to this work.

    • Depoliticize the appointment of the CBC/Radio-Canada president and board. In keeping with best practices for modern board governance, the CBC’s board should have a skills matrix, regional/demographic representation and cross-partisan or nonpartisan makeup. It should be structurally evident that the CBC/Radio-Canada serves all Canadians, not the current political government.

What We Learned From Two Years of Studying the CBC/Radio-Canada

Internationally, the CBC/Radio-Canada is recognized as a large, respected public media service, but domestically, it has lost relevance to a number of Canadians. Recent recommendations in the public sphere have typically addressed specific problems (i.e., the size of the English television audience) without addressing the broader question of the purpose of public media historically and today. Designed for citizens as well as educators and policy insiders, this report seeks to examine the greater needs of Canadians — reliable and relevant information, shared experience and communications to help keep us safe in times of crisis — within the context of what serves the greatest number of people in the current media climate. If a national public media service serves only certain regions or demographics, it fails. 

Like Canada, the CBC/Radio-Canada is unique — but many of the challenges it faces are shared by public broadcasters worldwide. Our research explores responses to everything from political threats to funding, technological shifts, and declining trust, along with emerging best practices from different jurisdictions for dealing with them. We place special emphasis on the rising role of public media in emergency preparedness and public safety, especially in response to the climate crisis and geopolitical threats (a role recommended for CBC/Radio-Canada but not yet formally established in law). 

While many recent policy proposals for the CBC/Radio-Canada are directed to its specific challenges, such as declining trust, we have sought to explore the mandate, funding and public engagement forms at the CBC/Radio-Canada in a context of global media and public service media trends worldwide. And going outside the current political climate, we asked Canadians directly what they think about their public broadcaster.

Adequate funding is key to a better, stronger CBC/Radio-Canada, but our research shows that a population is more willing to financially support their public media service if they report higher levels of trust in it. Therefore these recommendations and policy proposals for the CBC/Radio-Canada should be considered to be interconnected. Any endeavors undertaken to reform the CBC/Radio-Canada — whether through modernized legislation, demographic reviews, increased audience engagement, media literacy programs, more meaningful (not performative) representation and digital innovation must be considered together. Taken holistically, these measures can help to clarify what Canadians need – and deserve – from their public media service.

Amendments

  • A previous version of this report incorrectly identified Iqaluit, Saskatoon and Sydney as locations without a local CBC/Radio-Canada station. Services at a number of cities/regions across Canada, including Iqaluit, Saskatoon, and Sydney have been altered, leaving some satellite TV users without access to their local CBC/Radio-Canada programming. But all three of those cities have a station. Many other municipalities across Canada with populations over 50,000 do not have a CBC/Radio-Canada presence.


Jessica Johnson, Senior Fellow and Project Lead

Emma Wilkie, Research Assistant

Christopher Ross, Survey Analyst

Sequoia Kim, Research Manager

Skyler Ash, Copy Editor

Brian Morgan, Designer


Suggested citation: Jessica Johnson and Emma Wilkie, “What Should the CBC Be?” (Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy), July 2025. mediatechdemocracy.com/what-should-the-cbc-be-report.


License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to share, copy and redistribute this material provided you give appropriate credit; do not use the material for commercial purposes; do not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits; and if you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license, indicate if changes were made, and not suggest the licensor endorses you or your use. Images are used with permission and may not be copied, shared, or redistributed outside of this material without the permission of the copyright holders.